Anyway, why are they focusing only on this particular circumcision ritual?
Sounds to me like they just find the idea of a grown man sucking on a baby boy's winkle to be gross and that's the cause for their objection. The actual risk to these babies can't be the issue, otherwise why not ban all infant circumcision where there is no medical necessity to the operation? Hell, a baby in London died from a complication arising from a medically unnecessary circumcision just the other week-http://circumstitionsnews.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/london-baby-bleeds-to-death-two-days.html
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,